Difference between revisions of "Articles on AI and ethics/society"

From The Artificial Intelligence and Society discussion group
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
* Arntz et al.'s 2016 OECD report estimating 9% of OECD jobs are 'automatable': [http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5jlz9h56dvq7.pdf?expires=1464129758&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=468994034247D0ECA51F977DD3CF89F4 The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: a comparative analysis]
 
* Arntz et al.'s 2016 OECD report estimating 9% of OECD jobs are 'automatable': [http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5jlz9h56dvq7.pdf?expires=1464129758&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=468994034247D0ECA51F977DD3CF89F4 The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: a comparative analysis]
 
* Discussion of Frey and Osborne's paper in the Guardian: [http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/18/knowledge-economy-myth-more-universities-degree The knowledge economy is a myth]
 
* Discussion of Frey and Osborne's paper in the Guardian: [http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/18/knowledge-economy-myth-more-universities-degree The knowledge economy is a myth]
* Discussion of Arntz et al.'s paper on [https://robotenomics.com robotenomics.com]: [https://robotenomics.com/2016/05/18/robots-and-job-fears-new-oecd-study-says-automation-and-digitalisation-are-unlikely-to-destroy-large-numbers-of-jobs/ Robots and job fears: Destruction of large numbers of jobs unlikely, says new OECD Study]
+
* Discussion of Arntz et al.'s paper: [https://robotenomics.com robotenomics.com]: [https://robotenomics.com/2016/05/18/robots-and-job-fears-new-oecd-study-says-automation-and-digitalisation-are-unlikely-to-destroy-large-numbers-of-jobs/ Robots and job fears: Destruction of large numbers of jobs unlikely, says new OECD Study]
 +
 
 +
* David Autor's (2015) paper arguing against predictions about large-scale technology-driven job losses: [http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.29.3.3 Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation]
 +
* John Danaher's (2015) response to Autor: [http://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.co.nz/2015/09/why-havent-robots-taken-our-jobs.html Why haven't robots taken our jobs? The Complementarity Effect].
 +
* Another piece by Danaher (2015), with a discussion of (and support for) Autor's arguments for a 'polarising' effect of technology on jobs: [ http://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.co.nz/2015/09/automation-and-wage-inequality.html Automation and Income Inequality: Understanding the Polarisation Effect]
  
 
== Recent initiatives relating to the future of AI ==
 
== Recent initiatives relating to the future of AI ==
  
 
* Wired magazine report on Elon Musk's new 'Open AI' company (May 2016): [http://www.wired.com/2016/04/openai-elon-musk-sam-altman-plan-to-set-artificial-intelligence-free/ Inside OpenAI, Elon Musk's wild plan to set Artificial Intelligence free]
 
* Wired magazine report on Elon Musk's new 'Open AI' company (May 2016): [http://www.wired.com/2016/04/openai-elon-musk-sam-altman-plan-to-set-artificial-intelligence-free/ Inside OpenAI, Elon Musk's wild plan to set Artificial Intelligence free]

Revision as of 12:56, 26 May 2016

General reports and opinions about future AI

Discussions about the likely impact of AI on jobs

Recent initiatives relating to the future of AI