Difference between revisions of "Articles on AI and ethics/society"
From The Artificial Intelligence and Society discussion group
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Discussions about the likely impact of AI on jobs == | == Discussions about the likely impact of AI on jobs == | ||
| − | * Frey and Osborne's 2013 paper estimating 47% of US jobs are 'highly automatable': [http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/ | + | * Frey and Osborne's 2013 paper estimating 47% of US jobs are 'highly automatable': [http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation?] |
* Arntz et al.'s 2016 OECD report estimating 9% of OECD jobs are 'automatable': [http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5jlz9h56dvq7.pdf?expires=1464129758&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=468994034247D0ECA51F977DD3CF89F4 The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: a comparative analysis] | * Arntz et al.'s 2016 OECD report estimating 9% of OECD jobs are 'automatable': [http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5jlz9h56dvq7.pdf?expires=1464129758&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=468994034247D0ECA51F977DD3CF89F4 The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: a comparative analysis] | ||
* Discussion of Frey and Osborne's paper in the Guardian: [http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/18/knowledge-economy-myth-more-universities-degree The knowledge economy is a myth] | * Discussion of Frey and Osborne's paper in the Guardian: [http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/18/knowledge-economy-myth-more-universities-degree The knowledge economy is a myth] | ||
Revision as of 22:49, 26 May 2016
General reports and opinions about future AI
- Nature editorial on AI (April 2016): Anticipating Artificial Intelligence
- Economist report on robots (March 2014): Immigrants from the future
Discussions about the likely impact of AI on jobs
- Frey and Osborne's 2013 paper estimating 47% of US jobs are 'highly automatable': The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
- Arntz et al.'s 2016 OECD report estimating 9% of OECD jobs are 'automatable': The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: a comparative analysis
- Discussion of Frey and Osborne's paper in the Guardian: The knowledge economy is a myth
- Discussion of Arntz et al.'s paper: robotenomics.com: Robots and job fears: Destruction of large numbers of jobs unlikely, says new OECD Study
- David Autor's (2015) paper arguing against predictions about large-scale technology-driven job losses: Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation
- John Danaher's (2015) response to Autor: Why haven't robots taken our jobs? The Complementarity Effect.
- Another piece by Danaher (2015), with a discussion of (and support for) Autor's arguments for a 'polarising' effect of technology on jobs: Automation and Income Inequality: Understanding the Polarisation Effect
Recent initiatives relating to the future of AI
- Wired magazine report on Elon Musk's new 'Open AI' company (May 2016): Inside OpenAI, Elon Musk's wild plan to set Artificial Intelligence free
